Tenant Wi-Fi is a design flaw
Critical monitoring should never depend on a resident's router.
If your compliance strategy depends on connecting building infrastructure to a tenant's home Wi-Fi, you've engineered a failure point straight into the system.
Tenants change broadband providers. They reset passwords. They switch the router off at night to save electricity, or fall behind on the bill and lose the connection entirely.
The moment that happens, your monitoring goes dark — and you don't find out until you need the data.
You can't manage a statutory deadline under Awaab's Law if your evidence lives behind a password written on the back of someone's router.
The network is part of the design.
The architecture matters as much as the sensor. Long-range, low-power networks like LoRaWAN bypass tenant infrastructure completely — a device talks to a gateway on the roof or a nearby tower, straight through concrete walls and deep plant rooms.
It's independent, encrypted, and asks nothing of the resident. Their internet can be down for a week and your data keeps flowing.
The point.
Critical monitoring shouldn't depend on someone else's broadband bill.
If a resident can switch off your compliance by unplugging a router, it was never really monitoring.