What measurement found.
Anonymous accounts of what continuous monitoring uncovered. Named case studies follow as customers approve them.
The deliverable an estates team hands to its auditor — generated from a monitoring period, anonymised. Two samples to open:
BB101 Compliance & Comfort Audit
A secondary school, 30 days of monitoring. Where the rooms breach BB101 on heat and CO₂ — and the six fixes that come from the same sensors.
Download PDF →PDF · 3 pagesEnergy & Comfort Audit
A primary school, a year of bills against 30 days of sensor data. £17,921 a year on the table from a boiler running 8°C hotter than needed when the building’s empty.
Download PDF →5,000 classrooms — three years of continuous data
Heating systems ran when rooms were empty more often than not. The pattern held across both fleets independently.
Read the story →Schools · single-site studyA grammar school — 30 days of single-site data
88% boiler waste on weekends. 81% overnight on weekdays. 42% during school hours. Modelled saving: £23k/year.
Read the story →Social Housing · multi-site studyA landlord — three blocks under continuous monitoring
Continuous mould-risk evidence replacing six-weekly visual inspections. Awaab's Law audit trail by default.
Read the story →Schools · single-site studyA secondary — BB101 compliance dashboard
9.6% of teaching minutes flagged under-heated. CO₂ peaks identified before half-term, not after.
Read the story →Schools · single-site studyThe storage room that wasn't
A 15m² room registered as storage, behaving like a classroom every weekday morning.
Read the story →